Indiana beat OKC 116-107 in Game 3 of NBA finals
Mathurin scores 27 as Indiana dominate fourth quarter
Thunder shoot 6-17 in fourth, go scoreless from thre
Leave it to Indiana’s bench to swing the biggest game of the season. With the starters fading and the game hanging in the balance, Bennedict Mathurin and TJ McConnell turned Gainbridge Fieldhouse into a madhouse, leading the Pacers past the Thunder 116–107 on Wednesday night to seize a 2–1 lead in the NBA finals.
Mathurin poured in 27 points off the bench and McConnell was all over the court – diving for loose balls, snatching steals, dishing dimes – as Indiana overwhelmed Oklahoma City with a 32–18 fourth quarter. The Pacers outscored the Thunder 49–18 in bench points and closed the game on a 22–8 run, flipping a five-point deficit into a win that puts them two victories from their first NBA title.
“We just had guys make plays after plays,” said Tyrese Haliburton. “Our bench was amazing.”
Haliburton finished with 22 points, 11 assists and nine rebounds. Pascal Siakam added 21 points and the basket that all but sealed it: a smooth drive to the rim with 1:09 left to stretch Indiana’s lead to 112–104.
The Thunder, who had taken an 89–84 lead into the fourth quarter, were outplayed and out-executed down the stretch. They shot just 35.3% in the final period, went 0-for-4 from three-point range and committed five turnovers. Jalen Williams led Oklahoma City with 26 points, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 24 more and Chet Holmgren had 20 points and 10 rebounds, but went 0-for-6 from deep.
Indiana’s bench provided the burst. McConnell tied the game at 95 early in the fourth by intercepting Alex Caruso’s inbounds pass under the basket and flipping in a layup. On the next trip, he fed Mathurin for a corner three to give Indiana the lead.
After a brief rest, Haliburton re-entered, took a handoff at the top of the key and drilled his fourth triple of the night to make it 101–98 with 6:42 left. Then came a barrage: Andrew Nembhard’s elbow jumper, Obi Toppin’s put-back dunk, Aaron Nesmith’s skip-pass three,and another Mathurin floater. The Pacers had turned a track meet into a runaway.
Thanks to Mathurin’s scoring and McConnell’s defensive activity – he finished with 10 points, five assists and five steals – Indiana controlled the tempo and outworked Oklahoma City in the moments that mattered most.
“So many different guys chipped in,” Haliburton said.
McConnell also made plays earlier in the fourth, hitting a running right-handed layup between two buckets from Mathurin to keep Indiana close at 93–91. When the Pacers finally broke through, they never gave the lead back.
Still, Oklahoma City had one last shot. With 2:35 remaining and Indiana up 110–102, Caruso stole a pass and darted into the open court. As he stepped into the paint, Nesmith met him with a hard two-handed foul that sent Caruso sprawling. Officials reviewed the play, but ultimately ruled it a common foul. Caruso made both free throws, and on the next play, Myles Turner lost the ball out of bounds.
But Turner quickly atoned, stuffing Holmgren twice at the rim on the ensuing possession. Indiana got another stop,and Siakam’s layup put the game away for good.
The win extended a remarkable trend: the Pacers are now 10–0 since mid-March in games following a loss.
Oklahoma City had used a late-third quarter burst, highlighted by a Williams step-back three and Holmgren’s and-one baseline dunk, to take their largest lead of the half. But they couldn’t keep Indiana’s bench contained in the Pacers’ first home NBA finals game since 2000.
Game 4 is Friday night in Indianapolis, where the Pacers can take a commanding 3–1 series lead. Historically, teams that win Game 3 of a tied NBA finals have gone on to win the title 80.5% of the time.
We know, we know, we know …
Seeing these messages is annoying. We know that. (Imagine what it’s like writing them … )
But it’s also extremely important. One of the Guardian’s greatest assets is its reader-funded model.
1. Reader funding means we can cover what we like. We’re not beholden to the political whims of a billionaire owner. No-one can tell us what not to say or what not to report.
2. Reader funding means we don’t have to chase clicks and traffic. We’re not desperately seeking your attention for its own sake: we pursue the stories that our editorial team deems important, and believe are worthy of your time.
3. Reader funding means we can keep our website open, allowing as many people as possible to read quality journalism from around the world - especially people who live in places where the free press is in peril.
The support of readers like you in Pakistan keeps all that possible. At the moment, just 2.4% of our regular readers help fund our work. If you want to protect independent journalism, please consider joining them today.
We value whatever you can spare, but supporting on a monthly basis makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits. (Including making these messages go away.) We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it. Thank you.
Post a Comment